An assortment of words and phrases as typed by me. It's not that I have anything to say, I just love the sound of my own typing...

Saturday 14 March 2009

Thoughts on public housing in Tasmania

In the past few months I have noticed the subject of public housing appear in the media. As a home owner in Tasmania, any news about the housing situation there is interesting to me.

The current situation as I understand it is:

1. There is a shortage of rental properties in Tasmania


2. The rental properties that are available are overly expensive


3. Tasmania’s population recently exceeded 500,000 people


4. Housing affordability is very low


5. It is more difficult for people to get finance to purchase their own house


6. The federal government desires to spend big on public housing in order to keep the economy moving


7. There is a lack of new land available for the new housing which is required


Of course, because I am currently living in Poland, I do not have first-hand information about the situation. But I do have a different perspective. I am currently living in Jelenia Gora, an average sized city, in Poland. The population of Jelenia Gora is between 80 and 90 thousand people, so about half the size of Hobart. However it takes up about the same area as Kingston or Glenorchy. Most of the population lives in apartment blocks, and they are very happy about it.
We are living in a two bedroom apartment, which is one of sixty apartments in the block. The apartment block itself is five stories high and we live on the first floor. On our street there are about 40 such apartment blocks and I have no idea how many similar sized blocks are in the surrounding suburb. But anyway, the point is, that it is a lot more pleasant living here than I expected. There is ample room for the kids to play, our neighbours are polite, there doesn’t seem to be much crime around, the security system (although basic) works well…

And so I got to thinking: "Why couldn’t something like this work in Tasmania?"

I think that this could work quite well in Tassie, provided that the following requirements are met: 1. The apartments are positioned close (within walking distance) to shops and essential services such as public transport & schools
2. Ample car parking would need to be provided (it is not such an issue here, but Australians seem to need their cars)
3. At least half of the apartments should be sold to private owners. It is important from a cultural perspective that these places do not become a grotto for the unemployed (eg. Gagebrook)
4. The apartments should be built in desirable areas such as Taroona, Kingston, Clarence, South Hobart where there is already a positive culture. (Actually, the more I think about it, the best place to build these apartment blocks would be on the site of the existing Kingston High School)
5. The apartments should be heated centrally with ample insulation, including double glazed windows
6. There is ample space and facilities for children to play nearby
7. The outside of the buildings have an attractive appearance (not like this one)
8. Tasmanians would probably want to have lifts in these buildings, which are expensive things to own and run (of course the benefit of having a lift is that the buildings can be up to ten stories)

The main advantages of building these apartments would include:
1. Reducing the cost of providing public housing. A large part of the cost of housing these days is the cost of land. Apartment blocks use less land, and the land which is used is put to better use
2. These places would be more environmentally friendly. Central heating is much more efficient than heating individual houses. Also the people living in these apartments will not need to use the car all the time
3. Greater security (certainly against arsonists). Neighbourhood watch would be able to work much better


But of course there will be people who will argue with a proposal such as this. Probably the loudest objections will be from people who want a three or four bedroom public housing house on a quarter acre of land. Of course they want it, who wouldn’t? But if they are desparate for accommodation, then they should be happy with what they are given. I have no doubt that private buyers would be more than happy to buy these apartments.

3 comments:

  1. Hmmm, I don't think I would like to see this sort of crowding in our beautiful state! Then again i am not one of the people desperate for a place to live I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  2. When I was in Korea for a year, I came back to Australia and thought to myself that Sydney looks a bit like the countryside - the city is mostly 1 layer thick, just houses, not many apartment buildings, quite low population density compared to korean cities (and cities of probably most other countries in the world). I kind of like that feeling of living in high population density. It works out that everything is closer and more convenient because they have to have enough shops and services and entertainment etc to serve the number of people in the small local area..

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think high population density is claustrophobic and oppressive! All those people crowded in together, I think it would destroy one's sense of privacy and one's own space. There is something nice about having one's own home, their castle. I think high density housing is takes away individuality and freedom. Personally I think high rise apartments are not the way to go with housing.

    ReplyDelete